Grand English Opera Combination: Martha

Event Information

Venue(s):
Niblo's Garden

Proprietor / Lessee:
Henry C. Jarrett
Henry Palmer

Manager / Director:
Caroline Richings
Clarence D. Hess

Price: $1.50; $1 dress circle; $.50 family circle

Event Type:
Opera

Record Information

Status:
Published

Last Updated:
12 June 2023

Performance Date(s) and Time(s)

24 Oct 1870, Evening
29 Oct 1870, 2:00 PM

Program Details

Combined Parepa Rosa and Richings opera companies.

Performers and/or Works Performed

1)
aka Martha, oder Der Markt zu Richmond; Martha, or The Market at Richmond
Composer(s): Flotow
Text Author: Friedrich
Participants:  Grand English Opera Combination Company;  William Castle (role: Lionel);  Sherwood C. Campbell (role: Plunkett);  Caroline Richings (role: Lady Henrietta);  Zelda Harrison (role: Nancy);  Edward S. C. Seguin (role: Tristan)

Citations

1)
Article: New York Post, 01 September 1870, 2.

Includes company roster and repertory.

2)
Announcement: New-York Daily Tribune, 03 September 1870, 4.

Members of the company; season opens with Bristow’s Rip van Winkle.

3)
Announcement: New-York Times, 04 September 1870, 4.

Members of the company; season opens with Bristow’s Rip van Winkle.

4)
Announcement: New York Clipper, 10 September 1870, 182.

Principal artists; repertory.

5)
Announcement: New-York Daily Tribune, 14 October 1870, 8.

Roster; repertory for the first week.

6)
Announcement: New-York Times, 17 October 1870, 4.
7)
Announcement: New York Post, 18 October 1870, 2.
“The combined English Opera Company has lately met with great success in Chicago…This week the company is in Pittsburgh, and next Monday will begin an engagement at Niblo’s Theatre in this city, opening with Flotow’s ‘Martha.’ [Lists operas to be performed.]
 
[Lists company members and full repertoire.]
 
At present the operatic field is unoccupied, and the prospects for the success of the coming season at Niblo’s are therefore unusually good. The company is in many points a thoroughly admirable one. It is sufficiently large in its personnel to allow of a wide variety in the performances. The fact is that an English opera company like this should be permanently located in New York, and not allowed to roam all over the country.”
8)
Advertisement: New-York Times, 19 October 1870.

Includes roster and repertory.

9)
Announcement: New York Herald, 24 October 1870, 8.
10)
Review: New York Post, 25 October 1870, 2.
“After a successful career of a quarter of a century, Flotow’s ‘Martha’ retains its vitality better than many better operas. It always pleases a miscellaneous audience. Its melodies are distinct, easy to catch and to retain, and the whole work is pervaded by the flavor of that delicious Irish song to which it owes its chief popularity. The pleasing strains of this opera and its astonishing ideas of English life are as familiar in St. Petersburg, in Berlin or Vienna, or Paris or London, as in New York. Flotow has written lyrical works similar to this, but none which has ever made so general a success.
 
It served last night to re-introduce to our public a number of well-known artists, who are included in the combination company of English opera. Mrs. Richings-Bernard was the Martha, Mrs. Seguin the Nancy, Mr. Castle the tenor, and Mr. Campbell the basso. They form a clever and experienced quartet, and gave last night a fair average performance. Mrs. Bernard is fitted for better and heavier parts than that of Martha, but she was last night as careful and conscientious in it as the composer himself could desire. Mrs. Seguin sang the music of Nancy charmingly and with much artistic finish. She is always a satisfactory singer. Messrs. Castle and Campbell were as they always are, save that their voices last night appeared worn and tired. The chorus was good enough in respect to quality of voice, but sang in a careless manner. The orchestra was equally regardless of its duties. All these little defects, however, can be forgiven in a too familiar opera like this, and in a troupe fatigued by travel and work.”
11)
Review: New-York Times, 25 October 1870, 4.

“The performances of English opera at Niblo’s were commenced last evening, and ‘Martha’ was sung. The representation of the work calls for as few comments as the composition itself, which is hardly more familiar than are its latest interpreters. Its smoothness was its most conspicuous feature. An English opera season, extending over a few months, would make impossible the hurried and imperfect renderings of Italian works, which the proverb relating to the worth of half a loaf has heretofore caused us to welcome. The principal parts—the well-known quartet—were most capably filled, and the chorus and orchestra did their duty with spirit and precision. The scenery too, was quite fresh and appropriate, as a knowledge of the resources of the theatre might have led one to foresee. In a word, the singing and acting, and the stage-dress of the work gave unlimited satisfaction. Mrs. Caroline Richings-Bernard was Lady Henrietta, Mrs. Z. Seguin Nancy, Mr. W. Castle Lionel, and Mr. S. C. Campbell Plunkett.”

12)
Review: New-York Daily Tribune, 25 October 1870, 8.

“The English Opera Company—the only one now performing in this country—opened a two weeks’ season last night at Niblo’s Garden before an excellent audience that substantially filled the theatre. The troupe comprises a great deal of excellent material, having a double quartette of first-class artists and an unusually efficient force of secondary singers. It is not only one of the best we have ever heard in the United States, but, according to all reports, it is better than any company that can be organized now in London. But for the recollection of Parepa’s admirable performances last Winter, we should all be delighted with it. We should say that ‘Martha’ proved a very fortunate selection for the opening night. It was one of Parepa’s best operas, and we are inclined to think it is one of the least satisfactory in the repertory of the repertory of the present troupe. True, most of the principal singers are the same. Mrs. Seguin is still the charming and piquant Nancy, Castle and Campbell are the Lionel and Plunkett, and Mr. Edward Seguin is the Tristan. But then Parepa is not the Lady Henrietta, and Carl Rosa does not conduct the orchestra. For a good rattling, pleasant, sentimental, humorous performance of ‘Martha,’ we need, in the soprano above all the other parts, just those qualities in which Mrs. Richings-Bernard is most deficient. She is an excellent and most pains-taking artist, a woman of indomitable enterprise, a musician of high culture, to whom the English lyric stage owes a heavy debt of gratitude; but it is unnecessary to pretend that she is a very lively actress, or that she has any spontaneous fun, or that her voice is fresh enough to be grateful in ‘The Last Rose of Summer’ (admirable as was the spirit in which she sang it), or the other sentimental numbers in her role. Her Lady Henrietta, in short, was both musically and dramatically uninteresting, and diffused a mild atmosphere of decorous dullness over the whole opera. The honors of the evening belonged unquestionably to Mrs. Seguin. Always charming in her manner no less than in her beautiful voice, spirited in her acting, and conscientiously artistic in her delivery of the music, she is a singer who never fails to please. She returns prettier than ever, and her notes have lost none of their sweetness and none of their power. Mr. Castle, who has for some time been making rapid progress toward the highest place in his profession, was exceedingly good; he sang with spirit and with delicacy, and showed that too much familiarity with provincial boards has done him no harm. Mr. Campbell’s fine voice we understand returned to him at the opening of the season in all its pristine power, and lasted unimpaired through an arduous Chicago campaign. He caught in the vile atmosphere of Pittsburg what is known professionally as ‘the Pittsburg grip,’ and slight remnants of that disorder were perceptible last night—more in a necessity which he seemed to feel of sparing himself than in absolute hoarseness. A day or two of this weather will set him right again. Mr. Seguin and Mr. Howell were good in the subordinate parts. All will probably sing better when they become more familiar with the acoustic properties of the house. The stage is well furnished and the dresses are [illegible] and [elegant?]; but neither the chorus nor the orchestra is by any means perfect.”

13)
Review: New York Sun, 26 October 1870, 2.
“There is always a good field for English opera among us, and it is very gratifying to find it so well filled as by the combination company that commenced its short season of two weeks at Niblo’s Garden on Monday evening.
Flotow’s sunny little opera of ‘Martha,’ with which they began the week, is deservedly a popular favorite. The high idealists call it sundry naughty names, such as weak, shallow, jingling, and the like; but if, according to the old Roman, it is sweet to be silly on occasion, decidedly ‘Martha’ is as pleasant occasional fooling as heart could desire.
 
The members of the company are all well known to our readers, at least to all of them that take any interest in operatic affairs. Comment, therefore, on their individual characteristics of voice and acting is unnecessary. Suffice it to say that while the guiding hand of Carl Rosa and the steadfast voice of his better half are greatly missed, nevertheless Mrs. Richings-Bernard has gathered about her a company which, for general excellence, has seldom been equaled on the English operatic stage, either in this country or in London. Both Campbell and Castle, especially the latter, are singing at their best. As for Mrs. Seguin, she is always a vocalist pleasant to listen to, and as a pretty woman and graceful actress pleasant to see.
 
Neither the orchestra nor the chorus were altogether irreproachable in the simple virtues of tune and time. The market scene was very well mounted. There was a real panorama—which moved—an extremely wooden and imbecile Punch and Judy—and quite a comical bear, who, for the small part assigned him, acted with such conscientious thoroughness, that we could hope to see more of him in some higher sphere and on a broader stage.”
14)
Review: New York Herald, 27 October 1870, 10.

“The performance of ‘Martha’ on Monday, with the well known cast, Mrs. Bernard, Mrs. Seguin, Castle and Campbell, was admirable, and was received with the utmost enthusiasm.”

15)
Review: New York Clipper, 05 November 1870, 246.

Lists cast. “The opera was creditably placed upon the stage, and as far as the solos and concerted pieces were concerned, the music was exceedingly well rendered. The orchestra lacked evenness at times, and the choruses were not quite up to the standard. Mrs. Seguin as Nancy bore off the palm in the sprightliness and excellence of her singing and acting, though Mrs. Bernard was heard to advantage in the leading solos, especially in ‘Home Sweet Home,’ but her Martha lacks in warmth and style. Campbell was not in his best voice, but Castle sang very sweetly. The fair scene was the scenic feature of the performance. [Comments on other operas performed throughout the week.] The attendance on the opening night was large and fashionable, but on the remaining nights there was a decided falling off in the sale of tickets, owing, for one thing, to the election processions and meetings, and also to bad weather.”