Strakosch Italian Opera: Mignon

Event Information

Venue(s):
Academy of Music

Manager / Director:
Maurice Strakosch
Max Strakosch

Conductor(s):
Max Maretzek

Price: $2; $3 and 4, reserved seat; $1 family circle; $.50 extra, reserved seat; $5 box or front row of balcony

Event Type:
Opera

Record Information

Status:
Published

Last Updated:
19 October 2023

Performance Date(s) and Time(s)

22 Nov 1871, 8:00 PM
24 Nov 1871, 8:00 PM
25 Nov 1871, Matinee

Performers and/or Works Performed

1)
Composer(s): Thomas
Text Author: Barbier, Carré
Participants:  Strakosch Italian Opera Company;  Joseph Jamet (role: Lotario);  Domenico Coletti (role: Giorno);  Antoinette Ronconi (role: Federico);  Christine Nilsson (role: Mignon);  [tenor] Lyall (role: Laerte);  Marie Leon Duval (role: Filina);  Victor Capoul (role: Guglielmo)

Citations

1)
Article: New York Post, 14 November 1871, 4.

Plot synopsis.

2)
Advertisement: New-York Times, 21 November 1871, 7.
3)
Article: New York Herald, 22 November 1871, 10.

Description of the music.

4)
Review: New York Herald, 23 November 1871, 7.

“As was anticipated Thomas’ beautiful opera proved last night the most successful event of the season. The Academy had its usual assemblage of beauty, wealth and fashion, and the applause was of a more enthusiastic character than on any preceding night of the season. The cast included the following artists [see above]. The music of the opera is exceedingly interesting, and the instrumentation, in particular, graceful, varied and always in accordance with the dramatic character of the scene. Unusual pains were taken by the management to present the opera complete in every detail, and the audience gazed with astonishment at the unwonted feature of new scenery and appointments. The opera was very handsomely mounted, and the scene in the third act representing the lake, park and theatre near the Baron’s castle, was worthy of one of our comedy theatres. The dresses, also, in this scene were very different from the dingy garments that generally adorn the chorus of the opera here. The roles of Mignon and Filine are almost of equal importance, one serving as a foil for the other. Mignon is sad, sympathetic and childlike, both in her love for her protector and her jealousy; Filine is the accomplished coquette and heartless flirt. In the first act, in the entrance and procession of the gypsies, a cart laden with the traps of these vagrants is drawn on the stage and in it Mignon is discovered asleep. Nilsson never made a more charming appearance than in the coarse garments and bare feet of the young girl stolen by the gypsies. From her first simple, touching prayer to the Holy Virgin, in gratitude for her escape from her brutal master, which leads into a lovely ensemble or sestet, with chorus, in the Donizetti style, down to the exquisite terzet in the last act, in which she recognizes her father and lover, Nilsson seemed the very personification of childlike innocence. The romance ‘Non conosco il bel suol,’ which gives a tinge of sadness to all the music of ‘Mignon,’ was sung in a plaintive, touching manner without any pronounced attempt to create an effect, which would have destroyed its simple beauty. This romance is beautifully worked into the instrumentation in the latter part of the opera, appearing at the most unexpected times, and each time in an attractive form. As we predicted yesterday the most popular number in ‘Mignon’s’ music proves to be the styrienne of the second act. The duet of the swallows, sung by Mlle. Nilsson and M. Jamet, was deliciously rendered, although a little slower tempo would have given the figure for the strings at the commencement of each bar more prominence. In the last act the great dramatic ability of Mlle. Nilsson was shown to its fullest extent. The gradual awakening of memory when she is in the home of her childhood, with her father and lover bending over her with tender solicitude, and her joy in recognizing them, made the scene one of intense interest.

Mlle. Duval must be congratulated upon having made her first success this season, and a brilliant one too. The rôle of Filine is an extremely difficult and fatiguing one, the music being almost entirely of the bravura order. Like the ‘Connais tu’ in Mignon’s music, Filine has a dashing polonaise which gives a bright color to the rôle. This polonaise is by no means easy of execution; but all its runs, roulades and trills were given by Mlle. Duval with an ease, accuracy and spirit that surprised all who had heard her previously in other rôles. The part seemed admirably suited for her engaging appearance and coquettish manner, and she certainly availed herself of the opportunity to make a decided hit. M. Capoul won his greatest triumph this season as the susceptible and tender-hearted Wilhelm Meister. He was in excellent voice, and the charming aria, ‘Addio! Mignon,’ and the passionate music of the last act received full justice at his hands. He seems to have made a special study of love making on the stage, and his studies have made him a perfect master of the subject. Jamet sang and acted the rôle of the wandering harper and bereaved father very successfully. The music of this rôle is characterized by the harp passages, which constantly appear in the instrumentation. In fact, there is a strong individuality about the music of all the rôles in this opera. A word of praise is due to M. Lyall, who made his first appearance this season. The rôle of Laerte did not call for much at his hands, but that little he did gracefully and satisfactorily. The chorus and orchestra must have undergone severe training, as both were unusually good as far as accord goes, but they still need drilling for the sake of expression. Altogether the production of ‘Mignon’ may be looked upon as an unqualified success.

It is not exactly fair that Mlle. Nilsson and M. Capoul should have to bear the weight of this season on their shoulders, without having one artist capable of relievIng them for a single night. The effect of this constant strain on an artist’s voice is well known, and many fine artists have been placed hors de combat by its means. Now there will be another season of opera given at the Academy of Music in the spring, and it would be an excellent thing for the management to secure such great artists as Miss Kellogg and Herr Wachtel to alternate with Nilsson and Capoul. The liberal patronage bestowed upon the opera by the public demands from the management such a complete company of first class talent as will preclude the possibility of a disappointment. One prima donna and one tenor cannot be considered as sufficient for an opera company.”

5)
Review: New York Post, 23 November 1871, 2.

“An immense and brilliant audience welcomed the long-deferred production of ‘Mignon’ last night, at the Academy of Music. For once in this disappointing world, expectation and fulfillment were in harmony. We had, somehow, been led to expect in the opera, perhaps an interesting rôle for Miss Nilsson, but hardly a composition so fresh and charming on the whole. The music of the score is in the first two acts mainly vivacious and spirited, in the third almost entirely plaintive and tender. Its main fault is a certain deficiency in clear and distinctly-phrased and original melody, a fault somewhat exaggerated by the fact that the spoken text of the original French libretto is here converted into recitative, thus somewhat overbearing the arias and concerted music. As an offset to any defect in this regard, however, the music is, throughout, highly artistic in construction, graceful, sparkling or pathetic, as the feeling of the moment may require, exquisite in orchestration, and with a delicate and subtle correspondence between the music and the sentiment to be conveyed which is an excellent trait of the better modern school. It would be too much to ask that it should never remind us of old favorites. Thus, in the lively and joyous tone of the opening scenes an irrepressible sense will catch little strains and far-off bursts, as if were, suggestive of Cimarosa and the older Italian buffo music. In Filina’s charming air, ‘Io son Titania bionda’ there occur a few phrases of very Offenbach-like savor, and Mignon’s last air, ‘Potes io tornare,’ will to many recall suggestions of Gounod. It would exceed our limits to recount in detail all the charming numbers which won the delighted applause of the audience last evening. To our own thinking, the ‘Leggiadre rondinelle’ of the first act, sung by Nilsson and Jamet as only two such artists can sing it, was, in its exquisite and imaginative pathos, the gem of the evening, and the auditory were clearly of our opinion. Hardly less charming were Mignon’s air, ‘Non conosci quel suolo,’ (the famous ‘Knowest thou the land’) of the story. The ‘Titania’ air of Filina, the opening scena of the second act, Federico’s rondo-gavotte, ‘In veder l’amata stanza,’ and Mignon’s fantastic scena, ‘Io mi trovo piu vezzosa,’ are brilliant instances of the author’s skill in humorous, fantastic or bravura composition. The exquisite tenderness of Lotario’s air in the third act, ‘Di guel cor;’ of Guglielmo’s passionate outburst, ‘Rinascia nuova vita,’ and Mignon’s half-sung half-recited prayer, ‘O vergine Maria,’ show him not less powerful in touching our deeper feelings.

In this hasty review of some prominent points of the opera as a whole, we make slight mention of the merits of the separate artists, desiring to reserve such detailed comment till a second representation shall have made the music more familiar both to singers and audience. It may in general terms be said, however, that one and all seemed bent on outdoing themselves, and whereas this, in the case of Nilsson and Capoul, might appear ‘wasteful and ridiculous excess,’ the brilliance and spirit of Mlle. Duval’s singing in Filina, and the delightful feeling and grace, yet dignity, with which M. Jamet interpreted the old nobleman Lotario, had the merit of a slight surprise blended with the pleasure they afforded.
 
The setting of the opera was tasteful, rich and appropriate. The scene before the hostelry in the first act was capital in appointments and dressing, the conflagration in the second, most effective, and the castle chamber of the third a credit to the scenic artists in charge. The management have done their best to produce Thomas’s graceful work with every appliance which skill and liberality can give, and the public seems in the best humor to respond to their efforts.”
6)
Review: New York Sun, 23 November 1871, 1.
Review begins with remarks on the esteem with which Thomas is held in both France and Germany, followed by a plot synopsis. “The first act opens with a chorus for male voices very carefully constructed, and very bright and felicitous. This is succeeded by a trio for soprano, tenor and bass. And that in turn by the song that Mlle. Nilsson made so familiar at her concerts last season, ‘Knowest thou the Land’ (Kennst du das Land). Ambroise Thomas followed in illustrious footsteps when he set those famous words to music, for many a master had done it before him, among them the greatest of all, Beethoven. His inspiration, however, did not fail him, for he made a lovely song. How well Mlle. Nilsson sings it need not here be repeated. She had the accessories of scene and costume, and the aria was in its proper and fitting place, and had a meaning that it never possessed in the concert room. Of course it gained greatly by these surroundings.
 
In this act also occurs the beautiful ‘Duet des Hirondalles,’ one of the most charming pieces in the entire opera. It was delightfully sung by Mlle. Nilsson and Mons. Jamet, and received, as it well merited, an encore.
 
All the music of this act is full of life, the situations are novel, and the mise en scene excellent. The gypsies with their bright dresses, the ballet, the cart with Mlle. Nilsson sleeping on its load, the dancing dogs and the parrots made a picture replete with bustle and picturesque movement.
 
The costume of Mlle. Nilsson, both in this act and in other parts of the opera, is the one that Ary Scheffer has immortalized in his well-known picture of Mignon.
 
In the second act there is a sparkling and difficult polonaise for Filina, which Mlle. Duval sang with admirable bravura and facile vocalization. Mignon also has an admirable scene in dance measure, which she sang gracefully and charmingly. Guglielmo has an excellent aria in this act. (Addio Mignon)
 
This act is made famous by Mlle. Nilsson’s capital acting. Her costume is changed three times. First she appears as a page, and carries off the manly attire with a jaunty dash that many a young man might long to possess. Indeed, our stage ladies are getting to be quite at their ease in the bifurcated garments of the other sex. Her next costume is a bright pink silk—one of Filina’s dresses that she borrows without leave and tears off on being discovered and laughed at—and lastly her own ragged gypsy dress and bare feet.
 
In the last act is a very beautiful prayer (O Virgin Maria!) and a final trio of great power.
 
It was noticeable how admirably the music of this opera suited the singers. Neither of the four whom we have named have, Mlle. Nilsson perhaps excepted, ever appeared to better advantage. And the reason is obvious. The opera was written for the French stage by a Frenchman, and for the Opera Comique. All of the principal singers have had a French training, and are, if we mistake not, also all graduates of the Opera Comique. Capoul and Jamet were thoroughly at home, and both sang like the true artists that they are. Equally was Mlle. Duval suited with the florid music of her rôle. Thomas has given his two sopranos almost equally good parts, and yet he has managed to contrast them one against the other, so that the sad music given to Mignon sets off and heightens the effect of Filina’s brilliant measures.
 
Those who are unaccustomed to the music of the school in which Thomas writes will probably miss the elaborate arias that they are used to hear in Italian opera, and will find the long recitatives accompanied only by sustaining chords, and written in the parlante style, a trifle wearisome. But this cannot be otherwise, the principles of construction being so different. Thomas’s music has in parts often the character of an improvisation. His forms are not strictly or logically preserved, his purpose being rather to paint the situation musically than to elaborate an aria that shall show off his prima donna or primo tenore. Occasionally there is more than a resemblance to Gounod, especially when he approaches the romantic side of his theme. This is perceptible in the overture, and in the love scene in the second act. The cadences are particularly like those of Gounod.
 
Mlle. Nilsson’s rôle lies for the most part in the middle register of her voice, being written for mezzo soprano. Some of her critics have thought her weak in these tones, but her singing of this music will demonstrate the contrary. No such persuasive and gracious singing has been heard on the stage of the Academy within our remembrance. Although so highly finished, it has the quality of being effortless.
 
Those who prefer clamor to beauty and smoothness of voice will never find satisfaction in Mlle. Nilsson. She demonstrated last evening the great compass of her beautiful voice by taking Re in alt as one of her concluding notes, to the great delight of those who look upon the Do di petto as the crowning grace of the opera. Mignon is to be repeated on Friday evening and at the Saturday matinée, and we believe that it is an opera that will commend itself to the liking of our opera goers. It has real dramatic fire, movement, and intensity, and the music is melodious and never trivial or unworthy of attention.”
7)
Review: New-York Times, 23 November 1871, 5.
Mr. Ambroise Thomas’ opera of ‘Mignon’ was represented at the Academy of Music last evening, for the first time in this country. The qualities of the work, the beauties of the recital, and the favor with which the opera and its interpreters were received, will make an extended, though hurried notice, not unacceptable.
The story of ‘Mignon’ [synopsis follows].
 
The inexpressiveness of language in respect of music, and the characteristics of M. Ambroise Thomas’ performances make the treatment of the score of ‘Mignon’ a task of far greater difficulty than that of reviewing the dramatist’s work. Printed words have little relevance or charm compared with notes, and they are almost worthless when intended to reproduce effects wrought, as in the case of M. Thomas, by a continued exhibition of science rather than by means denoting inventiveness and attended with decisive impressions. In M. Thomas’ mastery of counterpoint, in his thorough knowledge of orchestration, and in his exquisite taste lies, in fact, the spell of his compositions. Were not his librettos prepared with an eye to the potency of acting and of dramatic incidents, perhaps too much of the pleasure of the listener would be sought in the orchestra. The best of M. Thomas’ tunes are vague, and their development often affirms a poverty in creativeness which the opening bars would deny. The skill of the musician and the elegance of his workmanship could have no stronger proof than the success, notwithstanding the author’s lack of genius, of several of his productions.
 
M. Thomas is most frequently and felicitously inspired in ‘Mignon,’ and this fact lightens the labor of appreciation and renders it more grateful. That the opera is not deficient, in any part, in a sensuous beauty which no lines can describe, may be inferred from what has gone before. But there are also some notable portions on ‘Mignon’ and these we may mention in their order. The overture, by its themes and instrumentation, is well fitted to serve as a preface to a tale tinged with a gentle sadness. Commencing with solos for the clarionet, the flute and the harp, it enfords the air ’Conosci il bel suol,’ which clings, in a fragmentary shape, to Mignon until the end of the opera; and the polonaise. The chorus of tenors and bassos to which the curtain rises is lively, but not at all striking, nor is Lotario’s recitative with the harp. The gypsy music, ushering the nomads who surround Mignon, is the first salient number, and is full of originality in rhythm and color. The tune is carried on in the orchestra, while the chorus is resumed. A waltz, admirably handled, but conventional in its motive, is bound to the chorus, the soprano vocalises of Filina overlaying the share of the instrumentalists. The quintet heard afterwards is only to be named as an excellent specimen of contrapuntal writing. The trio in the fifth scene is better; it is pretty, sparkling and deliciously accompanied, as are, indeed, nearly all the vocal parts in the opera. Subsequent to Mignon’s narrative to Guglielmo, is introduced the air, ‘Conosci il bel suol,’ the key-tune, so to speak, of the opera. It is a melody of infinite suavity in its contour and in its treatment, especially until the bars with the flutes. The ‘Duo delle Rondinelle’ is fanciful and pleasing, but not nearly so spontaneous. The finale of the act is elaborate, cleverly worked up, vocally, and provided with exquisite instrumental support. The freshest music of the score separates the first from the second act. The intermezzo consists of a gavotte, than which nothing could be more novel, brighter or quainter. A short bacchanalian song, by Laerte, recited behind the scenes, is conspicuous for a refrain endowed with what might be termed a grave beauty. The trio executed some minutes later is, like that in the first act, excellent gossip-music, spangled with the laughing notes of the soprano. A dance-motive for Filina is part of it, and is tuneful, if formal. Mignon’s styrienne is fascinating, mainly because bizarre, but the gypsy music woven into its last portion makes its close very effective. The rondo-gavotte assigned to Federico consists of the intermezzo already alluded to. Guglielmo’s romance, in the familiar style of the modern school of French opera comique, is pretty and telling when delivered, as it is, with the right method. Next in order is the duet ‘Sofierto hai tu;’ it is very touching, but more dramatic in the closet than on the stage. The polacca preceding the finale is in strong contrast to every other piece in ‘Mignon.’ Its rhythm, its brilliancy and its scoring, most delicate at times, and at others magnificently massive, assign to it the most prominent place in the opera. A few bars of recitative divide it from the finale, in which the confusion and fright consequent upon the alarm are skillfully portrayed by the management of the festal music heard before and now executed with a changed tempo, and accented by high passages for the violins. If the third act cannot be written of with as much detail as its predecessors, it is none the less to be loudly praised. It contains a melodious romance sung by Guglielmo. But it is to be cited rather as a mosaic of graceful phrases, forceful utterances and elegant harmonies, than as a series of distinct numbers. The terzetto and finale are in fine contrast with the melancholy of the earlier scenes, and the return to the key-tune of the opera is accomplished with a thorough understanding of the elements of a climax.
 
Last evening’s representation, which was witnessed by an audience that crowded the Academy of Music, was very smooth, and marked by every evidence of success. It need hardly be said that the interest of the drama is centered in Mignon, and it is almost as superfluous to record that the part should be intrusted to no more gifted or competent artist than Miss Christine Nilsson, for whom the Italian version of the opera was arranged. Miss Nilsson has added to the rôles she has made her own in America one in which the variety of her histrionic talent has ample opportunities to assert itself. Her personation is, in truth, deserving of much more minute consideration than can be allowed it at the close of a first night. But its principal points may be indicated. The birth of Mignon’s passion for Guglielmo, the joy with which her freedom is greeted, the first inroad of jealousy toward Filina, and its passionate outburst, were all pictured with an art the most finished comedienne might envy. At a later stage of events, the despair of disappointed love, and the subsequent fury aroused by the triumphs of a hated rival showed the tragedienne in the strongest light, while the pathos of the final scenes was of an order never previously attained to on the lyric stage of this City. That Miss Nilsson would sing the music in ‘Mignon’ with faultless finish and taste was to be expected. She had, of course, to repeat ‘Conosci il bel suol’ recited with a depth of sentiment and a delicacy of style not likely to be paralleled; the ‘Duo delle Rondinelle,’ and the styrienne. In the last-named piece, her acting combined with her singing to produce one of the liveliest sensations of pleasure experienced during the entertainment. Mlle. Duval proved herself a captivating and spirited Filina, and even the coldest of her hearers surrendered to her influence. Mlle. Duval is not a great artist, but she has an agreeable organ, anexcellent method, good looks, and an amount of histrionic experience imperatively needed by the songstress embodying the coquettish player. She acted exceedingly well, and her vocalization, if not absolutely perfect, was satisfying in no ordinary degree. Mlle. Duval’s delivery of the polonaise had general recognition, though her voice is hardly of the proper timbre, and was not always used with a strict regard to true intonation. Her share in the concerted pieces was more creditable, in our opinion, though not so unanimously appreciated. M. Capoul fared fully as well as the ladies. As Guglielmo, he bore himself with his habitual ease and grace, and recited his two romances, the one in the last act particularly, with that fervor of expression and breadth of phrasing which make his smallest efforts worthy of eulogy. The love passages with Mignon in the third act, could not fail of their force with interpreters such as M. Capoul and Miss Nilsson. M. Jamet pictured Lotario with much pathos in the two first acts, and with dignity in the third. His air at the outset of the last act was redemanded, and while his singing throughout the opera was stamped by the refinement which characterizes his style as much as it does M. Capoul’s, his performance in the final tableaux revealed his claims to regard as an actor more clearly than any previous specimens of his work. Mr. Lyall was an acceptable Laerte, and will be a welcome accession to Mr. Strakosch’s artists, when the indisposition he still suffers from shall have departed. Mlle. Ronconi’s voice is not strong enough for the Academy, and something more than an intelligent reading is looked for from Federico. We have only time and space to supplement this reference to ‘Mignon’ and to its public rehearsal by a note as to the creditable efforts of the chorus and orchestra under the baton of Mr. Maretzek. The relative smallness of the instrumental forces however, does not always make pianos safe, and the intermezzo alluded to above was taken so softly that it was quite undetected. The scenery in ‘Mignon’ is almost wholly new, and the dresses are all fresh and appropriate. The artists were recalled at the end of every act, and after the curtain had fallen for the night.”
8)
Review: New-York Daily Tribune, 23 November 1871, 4.

“The opera of ‘Mignon’ may be said to be founded indeed upon the favorite character of Goethe’s ‘Wilhelm Meister,’ yet the librettists M. M. Carré and Barbier, have taken little from the original story except the names of a few principal characters and a faint outline of one or two leading incidents. The work of the great German poet and philosopher would seem to offer no particular attractions to the maker of an opera book. Neither its plot nor any of its episodes can be called dramatic, the poetical beauty of Mignon is too fine for stage representation, and the sentiment of the story is too deep to be expressed in the theatrical action. Yet MM. Carré and Barbier have made an effective and graceful story, whose resemblance to the original, though not strong, is at least recognizable. It was Ary Scheffer, who showed them how to do it, just as he showed the same writers how to create a new Margaret for M. Gounod’s ‘Faust.’ It is Scheffer’s, not Gounod’s, Margaret whom we saw in the opera last Monday. It was Scheffer’s, not Goethe’s Mignon who was presented to us last night. Everybody knows the three scenes in which the artist has depicted the child-heroine; the pensive little figure of the bare-foot street-dancer, thinking of her native-country, singing perchance those exquisite verses, ‘Kennst Du das Land,’ the group wherein Mignon, stands at the knees of the old harper, and the tableau in which the girl with clasped hands and attitude of aspiration looks upward while the light of another life falls upon her face. It is upon these three pictures that the opera has been constructed. They do not show us, of course, the true Mignon, ‘daughter of enthusiasm, rapture, passion, and despair,’ but a wayward, yet graceful, sentimental, prematurely old child, developing into a tender woman. Goethe’s Mignon, so spiritual and yet so very human, so perverse and yet so loving, dies through the very intensity of her affection, and when she passes out of the pages of the book she leaves a void in the reader’s heart which none of the other personages can fill. The pathos of this ending is all missed in the opera, which finishes with the union of Mignon and Guglielmo, and the Harper’s recognition of his daughter; and though the exquisite art of the actress conveyed last night the idea that the hand of death had fallen upon the girl in her hour of happiness, this interpretation was not indicated—if indeed it was even justified—by the text. It is not worth while, however, to vex ourselves over the ruin of a poem which would not have suited Ambroise Thomas, nor perhaps any other writer for the lyric stage. Though the Mignon whom we have is not the mysterious ideal of the novelist, she is still a charming and loveable creation. Though the story is marred in some of its finest aspects, the plot is not a bad one, and at least may remind us of its poetical origin. The character of the old Harper, upon whom the librettists have bestowed the name of Laerte, given by Goethe to a very different person in the novel, is much better preserved than that of [illegible] and serves as an admirable foil to the delicacy of the young girl. The fascinating, lively, and heartless Pauline is hardly at all changed; and Wilhelm Meister, under the name of Guglielmo, loves, and wavers, and succumbs to the blandishments of the sex in the opera, as he does in the story. The page, Frederigi, and the actor Laerte appear in subordinate capacities, but display no individuality.

The work was first presented at the Opera Comique, in Paris, in November, 1866. It was given, of course, in French, with spoken dialogue. The Italian translation by Zafira was afterward arranged by M. Thomas for Drury Lane, where Nilsson, Faure, Bettini, Volpini, and Trebelli Bettini took the principal roles. Recitatives were substituted by the composer for the spoken portions. A second stanza was added for M. Faure in Lothario’s andante; in the first scene an air was introduced for Filina (Mme. Volpini) and a rondo-gavotte for Federigo (Mme. Trebelli Bettini) was borrowed from the familiar intermezzo preceding the Second Act. This Italian version was the one presented by Mr. Strakosch last night. Two additional airs were omitted, except Federigo’s, which was given in an abridged form. The rest of the opera was very little cut. M. Thomas has followed his book makers rather than Goethe. His music never suggests the depths of Goethe, or the strong passion of the real Mignon. It is labored without being profound and delicate without being highly emotional. Much of the same sort of grace which distinguishes Gounod is observable in Ambroise Thomas; but we miss in ‘Mignon’ the tenderness and spontaneous feeling which we admired so justly in ‘Faust,’ and for the want of which the freshness and elegance of the present work cannot wholly make amends. The score abounds in delicious phrases, but most of them are only fragments, for there is little flow of melody. The orchestration is not rich, but it is surprisingly refined. Of the separate numbers the best known is the popular Polonaise, given to Filina, and recurring in snatches and suggestions all through the work. There is a hint of it in the exquisite Duet of the Swallows, between Mignon and Lothario near the end of the First Act—one of the earliest glimpses afforded of that rare sense of the lighter beauties of art which is the principal charm of Ambroise Thomas’ music. Much better and more characteristic, however, than the Polonaise is Mignon’s song, ‘Non Conosci il bel suol’—the famous Kenst Du das Land—[quotes text].
 
This is true poetry; not indeed an adequate interpretation in music of the thought which Goethe here expressed in words, but a genuine heartfelt song, for having which the world is richer. There is pathos likewise in Mignon’s duet with Lothario, ‘Sofferto hal tui’ and in Guglielmo’s ‘Addio Mignon;’ while almost the whole of the last Act is at once sentimental and dramatic in the highest degree. The long trio between Mignon, Guglielmo, and Lothario, which brings the opera to a close, is a superb specimen of dramatic music.
 
Miss Nilsson’s Mignon is unquestionably one of the most striking of her personations, even if it is not one of the best. Every scene gives her an admirable opportunity for the display of her best characteristics. She is willful, impulsive, not very passionate—she could not be with this text and this music—but affectionate and tender. With it all there is about her the same soft atmosphere of melancholy that is diffused around the pictures of Ary Scheffer, and in her voice there is the plaintive and pensive tone which we instinctively associate with the Mignon best known to the multitude. Add to this that the part abounds in variety of situations, and presents the prima donna in the most picturesque aspects, and it will readily be understood that Miss Nilsson makes this part extraordinarily attractive. Mlle. Leon Duval was well cast in the role of Filina—and it is the first time she has been heard to advantage since she came to this country. She made an excellent impression both by her singing and her personal appearance. M. Jamet’s Lothario was admirable, nobly acted, and well sung. The Guglielmo of M. Capoul offers no excuse for extended criticism. Indeed, the composer has made the role singularly uninteresting, and such as it is M. Capoul does not exactly fit it. Miss Ronconi was the Federigo, and Mr. Lyall the Laerte, both being weak but well meaning. The opera is well mounted. There is some new scenery, and there are new dresses, and the stage is more carefully set than we have ever seen it before under Mr. Strakosch’s management. The conflagration scene, however, was shabby, and a great deal of irreverent laughter was excited by a corps of supernumeraries who ran three times into the burning building, and out again by the back way, coming up fresh from the opposite side, with a faint pretext of being three different gangs. They carried into the midst of the flames a step ladder, a coil of rope, a number of tomahawks, and a barrel apparently containing gunpowder; and at last stood patiently and roasted to death in full sight of the audience.” [Reprinted DJM 12/02/71, pp. 141-42]

 

9)
Review: New York Herald, 25 November 1871, 3.
“The second representation of the new opera of ‘Mignon,’ at the Academy of Music last night, drew, in spite of the rain, one of the most brilliant and fashionable audiences that ever graced the recognized Opera House of New York. ‘Mignon’ becomes even more interesting when heard a second time, as its freshness and novelty draw on the ear with additional effect at every hearing. The music is exquisite, especially when we consider that the composer, Ambroise Thomas, is a Frenchman, and is addicted to the many exceptional faults of a real genuine French composer. From beginning to end, from the time that Mignon appears on the stage, alighting from the cart in which she first is seen asleep among the Gypsies, until the last magnificent finale, in which she recognizes her father and lover, the character of Thomas’ heroine (or rather that of Goethe, limned by Ary Schaeffer and Kaulbach) is faithfully preserved. In the different kaleidoscopic scenes of the history of the ‘Mignon’ of Goethe Nilsson proved herself an artist of the highest order. Mlle. Duval created quite a furor by her brilliant rendering of the celebrated ‘Polonaise,’ which, after all, is the most popular piece in the opera. Capoul (improved very much by the removal of his whiskers) made in his rôle the greatest success he has gained this season. His rendering of the aria ‘Addio, Mignon,’ was truly artistic. Jamel acted and sung the rôle of Lotario as a conscientious artist should act and sing it. The other characters were respectably represented. The music is charming from beginning to end, and cannot fail to please at all times.”
10)
Review: New York Post, 25 November 1871, 4.

“The second representation of ‘Mignon’ tends to add clearness and precision to our earlier impressions, without modifying in any essential regard our judgment of the work as a whole. In melodic quality, the opera, naturally enough, gains on a second hearing. Airs and phrases which at first seemed vague, fragmentary or meaningless, stand out more distinct and and symmetrical, on the background of the harmony, and assume proper relation and significance. Prominent themes, such as the fundamental musical thought of the ‘Rondinelle,’ the ‘Titania’ and others, are recognized, not only in their separate importance, but as tingeing and inspiring the general tone of the composition. The general relation of the orchestration to the singing is more easily traced. The hearer learns with pleasure to appreciate the singular delicacy and light, fanciful, almost fantastic, yet sympathetic quality of the accompaniments, which never obstruct or swallow up the voices with heavy or strongly-colored harmonic masses, but weave their broidery of gossamer tones in fairy-like profusion, yet with exquisite modesty and refinement, about the main theme of the vocal score. Subtle hints and imaginative touches get clearer acknowledgment, such as, for instance, the little phrase of the ‘Rondinelle,’ hardly caught by a careless ear, which represents the dim but awakening sense of reminiscence in Mignon’s mind on the reappearance of Lotario later in the drama. Spite of a certain impalpable grace and charm in such morceaux as the ‘Conosci il Suol,’ ‘the Rondinelle,’ the ‘Titania,’ and Federico’s one air, and the like, we are still forced to admit that Mr. Thomas is not a great or forcible composer in melodic regards, even as compared with the somewhat time-worn and common-place merits of such men as Donizetti and Bellini. Strictly speaking, there is more of distinct and even enjoyable tune simply as such, in one act of ‘Sonnambula’ or ‘Norma,’ than in the whole of Thomas’s tone-poem; nor are we willing to allow that the evident and singable character of the airs should impair their popularity even with fastidious and thoughtful judges. But the great fault of these familiar writers, the lack of any depth of feeling and rich, dramatic and imaginative tone, in their music beyond its more evident expression of temporary or superficial emotion—the lack of thought in their work, in short—is amply made up in such compositions as ‘Mignon.’ Mr. Thomas, as judged by this work, is eminently an imaginative composer, not so much profound, perhaps, as sympathetic; though we are far from sure that he does not merit the weightier form of praise. As a dramatic poem, set to music, ‘Mignon’ seems to us an altogether delightful work, in which the judgment and higher aesthetic taste may take a keen satisfaction, apart from and above its more sensuous effect on the nerves or ears.

Misled by our interest in the music, we have left ourselves no space for the artists. Suffice it that we rank Miss Nilsson’s Mignon among her best creations. Not the pining, brooding enthusiast of Schaeffer, but the wayward, impulsive, passionate child of the Gypsy Camp, with the richer and nobler nature of the high-born woman breaking through, developed and brought to light by the chances and sorrow of her romantic story, as by the affection which forms its chief episode. M. Capoul is not in his element in the role of Guglielmo, and we miss the calm and even swell of voice and level delivery so enjoyable in his rendering of such parts as Elvino.

Mlle. Duval is bright and coquettish as Filina, but the music in its technical difficulty, and a certain elastic and bird-like lightness and frolicsome humor which pervades it, requires a more sympathetic organ and thorough ease and perfection of delivery than the lady yet possesses. She is good, but—we could wish and hope for better.
Jamet is better as Lotario than we have ever known him before, and the tender melancholy and deep feeling, the mingling of dazed hallucination and fine, old-time dignity and gentleness, in his impersonation, aided by his excellent execution of the music, make the part of the old harper a prominent and most delightful element of the picture.”
11)
Review: New-York Times, 25 November 1871, 1.

“The second representation of ‘Mignon’ at the Academy of Music, last evening, attracted an audience that filled the house. The impression which the elegant music and the picturesque story produced on the first hearing of both was much deepened by yesterday’s recital. From the uninterrupted attention bestowed upon the performance and the consequent appreciation of most of the beauties of Mr. Thomas’ score, we can safely prophesy that the opera will become popular to an extent not even the composer’s admirers dared expect. Before many weeks, ‘Conosci quel suol,’ the beautiful and touching air so finely delivered by Miss Nilsson, M. Capoul’s romance in the last act, and the splendid polacca will be familiar tunes, while the dance-music, which only sounds Offenbachian—and therefore inelegant—because the string forces of the orchestra ought to be doubled, will appear on all ball-room programmes of the Winter. Last night’s interpretation of ‘Mignon’ needs no detailed account. As on Wednesday, the singing of Miss Nilsson, so varied in its eloquence, and, throughout, so earnest and finished, with her capital acting, in which petulance and passion, sadness and fury, are expressed with a resource and a skill never equaled on the lyric stage of America, elicited repeated evidences of admiration. The vocalization of Mlle. Duval, whose pyrotechnic notes brighten the concerted pieces of the opera, and her execution of the polacca, also supplied an amount of pleasure shown by frequent and enthusiastic applause. To say that M. Capoul sings with sentiment, science, and taste, and that his whole performance is characterized by rare conscientiousness and talent is only to repeat words whereof the writing has been an imperative duty after each entertainment of the present season. M. Jamet’s embodiment of Lotario is worthy of the thoughtful and experienced artist his previous exertions disclosed. Mr. Lyall, who is fast recovering from his indisposition, acquitted himself yesterday very creditably of the difficult and thankless task set for Laerte. The pieces encored last evening were ‘Conosci quel suol,’ the ‘Duo delle rondinelle,’ the styrienne, the polonaise and M. Capoul’s last romance. But acknowledgments of the demands for repeats were in some instances conveyed to the audience by the not fatiguing means of bows. There were also calls before the curtain, and, in brief, all imaginable indications that ‘Mignon’ is not merely an acceptable novelty, but a work which must be henceforward a permanent part of the repertory.”