Strakosch Italian Opera: Faust

Event Information

Venue(s):
Academy of Music

Manager / Director:
Max Strakosch

Conductor(s):
Emanuele Muzio

Event Type:
Opera

Record Information

Status:
Published

Last Updated:
6 April 2025

Performance Date(s) and Time(s)

03 Oct 1873, 8:00 PM

Program Details

New York debut of Maurel (though he did sing in Brooklyn the previous evening). He sang an aria from Verdi’s Vêpres siciliennes, but it is unclear at what point in the opera he did so.

The same opera was performed at the Stadt Theatre on the same evening (see separate event entry).

Performers and/or Works Performed

1)
Composer(s): Gounod
Text Author: Barbier, Carré
Participants:  Military band, unidentified;  Strakosch Italian Opera Company;  Domenico Coletti (role: Wagner);  Christine Nilsson (role: Marguerite);  Annie Louise Cary (role: Siebel);  Mme. [mezzo-soprano] Cooney (role: Marthe);  Victor Capoul (role: Faust);  Romano Nannetti (role: Mephistopheles);  Victor Maurel (role: Valentin)
2)
aka cavatina; Deh! tu calma, o Dio possente; Pray, O mighty God, calm with thy smile both sky and sea
Composer(s): Verdi
Participants:  Victor Maurel

Citations

1)
Advertisement: New-York Times, 02 October 1873, 7.
2)
Advertisement: New York Herald, 02 October 1873, 8.

“Powerful Chorus of 60. Grand Orchestra of 50. Full Military Band, Fanfarre [sic], &c., &c.”

3)
Announcement: New-York Times, 03 October 1873, 5.

“‘Faust’ will be sung at the Academy of Music, this evening. With the traits of the performance we shall deal at length to-morrow; we may mention at present, however, that a hearing of the opera at the Brooklyn Academy, last night, offered assurance that the New-York recital of Gounod’s favorite work will be exceptionally fine.” Reviews Brooklyn performance.

4)
Review: New York Herald, 03 October 1873, 7.

Long review of Nilsson’s performance in Faust on 10/02/73 in Brooklyn. The performance also featured the season debut of Signor Maurel.

5)
Review: New York Sun, 04 October 1873, 1.
“A very large audience gathered at the Academy last evening on the occasion of Madame Nilsson’s second appearance. The opera was ‘Faust,’ in which she has always been so great a favorite. The cast included, besides Madame Nilsson, Miss Cary, Signor Nannetti and M. Maurel.
 
The latter was the only one to make a first appearance on this occasion, and it is somewhat unfortunate, so far as he is concerned, that he should be heard for the first time in so inconsiderate a rôle as that of Valentino. He has been spoken of in the highest terms—even as the equal of Faure, a praise to which he certainly is not entitled. He showed himself, however, to the extent that the rôle permitted, an artist of great finish. His voice—a baritone—is mellow and pleasant, and has a high range. His manner is manly, his acting spirited, and on the whole he is a singer who is to be depended upon, and who will make a valuable addition to the strength of the present company. The artists of this company, in fact, as they appear one by one, have so far given very general satisfaction.
 
Signor Nannetti, the basso, who took the part of Mephistophiles last evening, made good the promise of his first night. His voice is lighter than could be wished and did not hold out very well, so that the serenade in the fourth act was quite tame and ineffective; but his excellent conception of the part, and the general certainty and correctness of his singing made his performance on the whole a very good one.
 
Miss Cary made, as usual, a charming Siebel, dressing the part with fine taste and singing so well as to make it very apparent that she has gained in strength of voice. With modest and wise discretion she declined the encore so persistently tendered to her after her principal aria in the garden scene.
 
Madame Nilsson’s conception of the character of Marguerite is too well known to need comment. It is symmetrical, imaginative, and touching. The early scenes—those of the maiden life of the young girl—Madame Nilsson has always represented with exquisite purity, sympathy, and tenderness. The lack of warmth and color that has heretofore marked the intenser [sic] love passage was still conspicuously absent. Even the fervor of Capoul, whose simulation of love is ardent and natural, reflected no warmth upon the prima donna in the famous duet. In the more dramatic portions of the opera, however, and when passions other than that of love were to be depleted, Madame Nilsson’s acting was of consummate excellence.”
6)
Review: New-York Daily Tribune, 04 October 1873, 6.
“‘Faust’ was very well presented last night at the Academy of Music—better as a whole than it has been for a great many years. The Margherita of Madame Nilsson would alone have made the performance memorable. There are two ideals of this character; and of one of them she is doubtless the best living type. It is a marvelously beautiful creation, as pure and colorless as moonlight, and almost as cold. It is never lighted up with spontaneous fire, but it is molded with exquisite grace, and tinged with the most fascinating romanticism. If it differs widely from the simple plebian Gretchen of Goethe’s poem, it comes very near to the etherealized and somewhat sentimental heroine of Gounod’s opera—a French Gretchen with a good deal of her charming naturalness rubbed off, and some very pretty graces put in the place of it. We do not think Madame Nilsson quite reaches the pathos that underlies the music; but her interpretation is nevertheless most wonderfully delicate. The strong dramatic situations she grasps with the keenness of a great artist—we had almost said with the intuition of genius—and in the famous church scene she produces an impression that will not soon be forgotten. This scene was placed last night before the soldiers’ chorus and the death of Valentine—an arrangement which does not correspond with the original poem, and does not produce a good musical effect, the blaring fanfare militaire breaking in upon the close of the most tragical and awful number in the opera with a violent shock. It involves also some ‘business’ which might be awkward in the hands of an actress less accomplished than Nilsson, for Margherita, after her struggle with the tempter in her vain attempt to pray, must get off the stage to make room for the commonplace military march. Madame Nilsson did it with great ingenuity. The action takes place outside the church (as it always used to when the opera was first played in New-York), and at the end Marghertia staggers towards her house. Meeting the fiend face to face, she stands for a moment transfixed with horror, and then falls back senseless. The women coming out of the church pick her up, and lead her to her own door, and she staggers across the threshold. All this was admirably managed, but it was less effective than the arrangement which Nilsson followed two years ago and Lucca last season.
 
There is little to be said of Madame Nilsson’s singing last night, except that her voice was perceptibly fuller and richer than it was two years ago, and that her execution was much more careful than it was on Monday night. Neither is it necessary to say much of the Faust of M. Capoul or the Siebel of Miss Cary, with both which our public is sufficiently familiar. M. Maurel made his début as Valentine, and sang in the second Act [sic] the air which Gounod arranged from a melody in the overture for the benefit of Mr. Santley when the opera was first produced in London. M. Maurel’s voice is a high baritone, neither very rich nor very robust, and marred a little by the vibrato which seems to be ineradicable from French voices; but he is an artist of high rank, with a thorough control of his resources and a noble and graceful action. He is by no means a Santley, but he is an excellent singer. Signor Nannetti, in the character of Mephistopheles, confirmed the high opinion we formed on Monday alike of the quality of his voice and his method; though the voice is perhaps neither deep enough nor rotund enough for this particular point. All the principal members, in fact, of Mr. Strakosch’s company are artists of unquestionable eminence, and it is rarely that we hear a troupe in which the average level of ability is so high. We can discern no great improvement yet in the chorus, but the orchestra grows better and better all the time.”
7)
Review: New York Post, 04 October 1873, 2.

“In the successful representation of ‘Faust’ at the Academy of Music last night, Madame Nilsson renewed her triumphs of previous seasons in this opera. Her personation was graceful and dramatic, and she made frequent use of the chest tones which, of late, have added to the richness of her voice. Capoul sang admirably, always appearing to his best advantage in this opera. Nannetti is a Mephistopheles of the average conventional type, and though singing creditably, awakened no enthusiasm. The new baritone, Maurel, was a marked success. He sang in the second act a noble aria written for Santley and by him introduced into ‘Faust.’ Maurel’s voice is smooth and tender, and he sings like an artist. Miss Cary’s Siebel is always acceptable.”

8)
Review: New-York Times, 04 October 1873, 5.

“The large and fashionable audience that tenanted the Academy of Music, last evening, enjoyed a very fine performance of ‘Faust.’ Well as ‘Il Trovatore’ wears—and it must be noted that Verdi’s still-attractive opera is much older than Gounod’s—we doubt if the future does not prove that the exquisite workmanship of the French setting of Goethe’s poem has given it a strong hold on public favor than that of its single competitor in this country. Certain it is, meanwhile, that to announce ‘Faust’ is to make sure of very weighty receipts, and certain it is, too, that so highly satisfactory a representation as last night’s will admit of frequent repetition of the announcement. The Brooklyn recital of the opera, briefly adverted to in this place yesterday, awoke expectations which were not disappointed. Little information, it is true, was needed as to the charm and impressiveness of Mme. Nilsson’s personation of Margarita, and the qualities of Faust, as portrayed by M. Capoul, were also familiar; the rendering witnessed Thursday, however, promised a capital ensemble, and of this promise it was proper that a record should be made and its fulfillment acknowledged. After the many notices written of Mme. Nilsson’s achievements in Gounod’s work the theme is not very suggestive. Mme. Nilsson’s Margarita is rather the blue blood maiden limned by Ary Scheffer than the rough-handed Gretchen of the German poet, but it is a picture exquisite in its lines, and most delicate and harmonious in its coloring. Mme. Nilsson’s acting is at present more refined, if anything, than during her first year’s stay, and this refinement pervades her whole portrayal of Margarita. But it does not exclude the contrasts planned by the librettists and the composer, and to these the skill of the comedienne gives as much effectiveness as even a public of less culture than her efforts summon can wish. Margarita’s share in the first and second acts of ‘Faust’ is limited; in the second, her actual participation in the business of the drama commences, and it continues until the close. The stages of the action at which, last evening, Margarita’s representative elicited most applause were the same to which the dilettante has always looked forward, but never with more confidence as to their significance than when Mme. Nilsson is the heroine. The short love passage, when Faust offers Margarita his arm, was listened to with becoming attention; the pretty revery-scene, when the girl’s thoughts wander from her task at the wheel to the image of the courteous cavalier; the bright jewel-song, in which childish glee and virginal coquettishness are, ’twixt the music and the delivery, so happily expressed; the delicious love duet, in which no artist depicts so truthfully as Mme. Nilsson the birth and growth of the passion to which she is to succumb; the fine scene in the church; the touching incident of Valentino’s death, and the culminating duo were as many opportunities for using with consummate art a voice fresh and powerful, and for making clear the details of a symmetrical and elaborate performance. M. Capoul, as hitherto, was Faust, and a very graceful and impassioned personage. M. Capoul, as we have often said, is a most intelligent and earnest actor, and none of his efforts, and much less his effort in ‘Faust,’ can with justice be disregarded. Twice during the representation his exertions commanded very hearty encouragement; he was a worthy partner of Mme. Nilsson in the duet in the second act, and he sang with much fervor and great eloquence of phrasing the ‘Salve, Dimora.’ Mephisto was sung by Signor Nannetti, whose successful début occurred on Wednesday. Signor Nannetti’s fine voice was as appreciable in ‘Faust’ as in ‘Lucrezia Borgia,’ but the gentleman, by illustrating the proverb that Satan is not so black as he is painted, showed a Mephisto who could, without suspicion, walk the earth in company with Faust, and we fancy that the contortions of the accepted character were regretted. M. Maurel’s Valentino afforded as much pleasure in New-York as in Brooklyn. Mr. Strakosch in securing him secured an artist pur sung. His rich and resonant tones, his faultless delivery of recitative and cantabile, his mastery of the histrionic art, and his handsome face and form designate him as a prize indeed. Valentino, in the hands of a mediocre performer, is a very insignificant individual. M. Maurel’s Valentino, by means of the ‘Dio possente,’ the trio prefatory of the duel, and the death scene is unquestionably the most striking male character in ‘Faust.’ Miss Annie Louise Cary was Siebel; she avoided with much difficulty repeating ‘Le parlate d’amor.’ Chorus and orchestra were unexceptionable.”

9)
Review: New York Herald, 04 October 1873, 7.
“The success of ‘Faust’ last night at the New York Academy amply fulfilled the expectations raised in the minds of those who attended its first representation in Brooklyn on the preceding evening. As we have already spoken of the principal features of interest in this performance of Gounod’s masterpiece, it only remains to point out, in detail, some of the beauties that enriched it. The vision of Marguerite, in the first act, that tempts the philosopher from his allegiance to Heaven and places him irrevocably in the power of the fiend, is one of the prettiest effects that have been seen on the boards of the Academy for many years. The lime light seems to fall on a figure of Carrara marble rather than on a living being. The calm purity and holiness of the village maiden, as she returns from church and passes through the market on her way home, are shown in every word and action of Mme. Nilsson, in the second act, brief though her presence may be on the stage. The tearful story of her earliest love, a dear sister, whom death snatched away from her, is told to Faust in the garden scene with touching expression. The ecstatic love breathed forth in the accents, ‘Sempre amar,’ and the deep feeling that seems to thrill each heart string like the wind sighing on an Æolian lyre, conveyed in the passionate declaration ‘Senza te, io voglio morir,’ were gems of the Diva’s impersonation in this scene. The fourth act is very much improved by placing the death of Valentine at the end. The first scene of this act represents the exterior of the church instead of the interior, as we have been accustomed to see on the American stage. Marguerite can only reach the steps leading to the door of the church, as the taunting voice of the demon behind her recalls to her mind her position as an outcast and seems to interpose an insuperable barrier between her desolation and the merciful arms that Heaven stretches forth to her. The same demoniac power draws her away gradually from the shrine of grace, until, suddenly turning around, the mocking face of the fiend meets her eye. The white arms are thrown up in agony, an expression of despair convulses the face, a short gasp and the form sinks on the stage, as a flower withering in the breath of a simoom. As a piece of acting alone this scene would entitle Mme. Nilsson to the highest praise, and when united to her exquisite voice, which so readily responds to every pulsation of human passion, it sinks deep in the mind of every listener. The village congregation leave the church and find her lying insensible at the bottom of the steps. They raise her, and, by their kind offices, restore her to consciousness. She breaks away from them with a gesture of horror, as if her very touch were contamination, and agonizing despair is in her countenance as she enters the home she has disgraced. This is the gem of Nilsson’s impersonation of Marguerite.
 
Maurel sang the rôle of Valentine, and acted it, too, in a manner that placed him in the estimation of the audience a genuine favorite among the artists of Mr. Strakosch’s troupe. The interpolated aria ‘Dio possente,’ was deliciously rendered, and the death scene as Gounod intended it should, for in the original score such directions are given. Nannetti has an imposing appearance in the rôle of Mephistopheles, and sings the music with intelligence and effect. We have spoken before of the faultless impersonations of Miss Cary and Capoul.”