Anschütz German Opera: Don Giovanni

Event Information

Venue(s):
Academy of Music

Proprietor / Lessee:
East 14th St at the corner of Irving Place Academy of Music

Conductor(s):
Carl Anschütz

Price: $1 parquette and balcony; $1.50 reserved parquette and balcony; $.50 family circle; $.25 amphitheatre

Record Information

Status:
Published

Last Updated:
11 April 2018

Performance Date(s) and Time(s)

09 Dec 1863, Evening

Program Details



Performers and/or Works Performed

1)
aka Dissoluto punito, Il; ossia Il Don Giovanni Libertine Punished, The; or Don Giovanni
Composer(s): Mozart
Text Author: da Ponte
Participants:  Anton Graf (role: Leporello);  Marie Frederici (role: Donna Elvira);  Heinrich Steinecke (role: Don Juan);  Theodore Habelmann (role: Don Octavio);  Pauline Canissa (role: Zerlina);  Joseph Weinlich (role: Comthur);  Bertha Johannsen (role: Donna Anna)

Citations

1)
Announcement: New-York Daily Tribune, 08 December 1863.
“Don Juan, an Italian opera by Mozart, translated into German, will be played.”
2)
Advertisement: New-York Times, 08 December 1863, 7.
“Fourth [sic] subscription night.”
3)
Advertisement: New-Yorker Staats-Zeitung und Herold, 08 December 1863.

4)
Advertisement: New York Herald, 09 December 1863.

5)
Announcement: Courrier des États-Unis, 09 December 1863.
“The work of Mozart is being prepared with special care by the German opera troupe.”
6)
Announcement: New-Yorker Staats-Zeitung und Herold, 09 December 1863, 8.

“Mr. Anschütz is ready to present several big German operas in this and the following week, which should attract not just the Germans but also an American audience. The only English-speaking newspaper that speaks in favor of the German opera, the ‘Express,’ says, correctly, that it is very much in fashion to go to an Italian opera, but not to a German opera. So it is Mr. Anschütz’s task to make the German opera more popular, to make it fashionable. He will only be able to do that if he presents the big German operas that the Italians are not capable of giving. We have heard that this is his intention. After Don Juan, Faust will follow, then Tannhäuser and several more.  The last two operas mentioned are supposed to surpass in splendor anything ever seen at the Academy. Several members of the Anschütz Company, like Miss Lang and Mrs. Rotter, whose re-hiring certainly delights every friend of the German opera, will perform in the course of the next week. All the roles of Don Juan are well cast for the performance tonight. We expect the house to be filled.”

7)
Advertisement: New-Yorker Staats-Zeitung und Herold, 09 December 1863, 6.
8)
Review: New York Herald, 10 December 1863.
“There was a fine house last night. . . . Anschutz’s artists appeared with success. . . . The instrumental music was admirably executed and the choruses were well sung.  We can say but little, however, as regards any individual effort in the opera.  Mme. Johannsen sang the role of Donna Anna satisfactorily.  Herr Habelmann’s pleasant voice was heard to great advantage in the role of Don Octavio.  This artist is evidently gaining favor with the public.  Herr Steinecke was a very indifferent Don Juan, while the Leporello of Herr Graff was a parody upon the role as it is customary to see it rendered.  It is asserted that the Germans find fault with the Italians for making a buffoon of Leporello; what they will say to Herr Graff’s idea of the part?”

9)
Review: New-York Daily Tribune, 10 December 1863, 12.
“The Academy of music presented an improved appearance last night. The third and fourth tiers were liberally strewed with distant spectators. The pit were pretty well provided with hearers; the first tier was rather full of connoisseurs, and the unhappy dress-circle par excellence, looked somewhat less scrawney [sic] than usual under the Germanic rule. Don Juan is an Italian opera by Mozart--and we say Italian because such is the ignorance of libretto historics that a delusion prevails in some quarters that it is of German text originally, whereas every melody shows the Italian meter, versification, and style, ex necessitate, as any aspirant to criticism ought to know. The author of the libretto, Signor Daponte [sic], lived in this country some thirty years ago, a very old man: we mention this rather stale fact for the friendly counsel of dissidents.
 
Mr. Anschutz keeps his orchestra in good order, and all the beautiful details of instrumentation are clearly given. The chorus was not so full as in Fidelio, and as there is so little for it to do, the difference was not remarkable. The cast was--[lists cast]. The performance was not equally good. Frau Frederico was apparently scared, beside some other extenuating circumstances. But there were some points which pleased the audience, and the play passed off cheerfully, with suave melodies of the great composer. We have heard Madame Johannson to better advantage, but she is so good an artist that she ever pleases and instructs artistically.
 
It is a great draught on the memory and study of a company to change an opera every night, to satisfy an intelligent audience. Twenty years ago, when New-York made no pretensions to art, Don Giovanni ran some twenty nights in succession, with Mr. and Mrs. Seguin, and Mr. Guibeli and Miss Poole, &c.; Cinderella, before that with Mrs. Austin ran we believe seventy nights in succession--both translated into English. With a quadrupled population, and wealth twenty times greater, an opera has a spasm of a whole night now, and then is changed for another.”
10)
Review: New-Yorker Staats-Zeitung und Herold, 10 December 1863, 8.

“Last evening’s performance of ‘Don Giovanni’ was with an almost-full house.  Unfortunately the performance last night was clearly challenged: Mr. Steinecke, as ‘Don Juan,’ was ill, or at least not in good voice, and Mad. Johannsen, as ‘Donna Anna,’ was indisposed.  Of course, this affected the performance gravely.  Those received with favor were Ms. Friderici [sic], Ms. Carlissa, and Mr. Habelmann, who excited the audience with his B-flat major aria.” 

11)
Review: New-York Times, 13 December 1863, 5.

“Mozart’s opera of ‘Don Giovanni’ was given here on Friday night . . . and the house, we are glad to say, was densely filled.  The performance was a spirited one in many respects, and, as far as the orchestra was concerned, we do not remember to have ever heard the work better rendered.  There are not many opportunities for the chorus, but the few demonstrations that occur were given with great spirit.  Mr. Anschutz played the opera without curtailment, and restored the tenor aria in the first act, which was effectively rendered by Mr. Habelman.”

COMMENT: The review mistakenly says Don Giovanni was given on Friday night, 12/11 instead of Wednesday night, 12/09.  Der Freischutz was the opera heard on Friday.
 

12)
Review: Musical Review and World, 19 December 1863, 302-303.

Part of review that mentions all operas performed this season.

“Don Giovanni’ [sic] was less enjoyable. Most of the singers suffered from cold, with the exception of Mrs. Friderici [sic] (Elvira), who was, however, under a still worse disadvantage, being so frightened that she lost her ground in her first air, and made several unsuccessful attempts to recover it. This lady is young, and has a good strong voice. But in a city, where among amateurs there is more talent and ability for singing than perhaps in any other city in the world, a pretty voice alone is of very little account. She, as well as M’lle. Canissa (Zerlina), ought before all things, to learn how to breathe, how to phrase—in short, how to sing. Their tone will then lose that coarseness, which, to a cultivated ear, is worse than the want of voice.

We learn that Madame Rotter will be re-engaged, and ‘Jessonda,’ ‘Euryanthe,’ and ‘Tannhäuser’ will be given shortly. This is a right step. We only hope that it is not too late for all this. It almost looks like it. There is no use denying the fact that the present season so far has been a failure. As the performers are, with one exception, the same we had last year; as, moreover, some valuable acquisitions to the company have been made in the two tenors; and further considering that the attendance last year was quite liberal, while this season it is very scanty, we must come to the conclusion that there are some outside causes for this change. One of the most prominent is undoubtedly the dislike the bulk of the German population have against the house. Why it is we do not know; but the truth is, that the middle class of the Germans—those who must be the foremost supporters of the German opera in this city—will not go to the Academy of Music. They further object to pay one dollar and a half for admission and a reserved seat. If they can see a performance for fifty cents and twenty-five cents, or even fifty cents additional for a seat, they will support the opera handsomely. But after all, not too much must be expected of the Germans alone. They have furnished, by subscription, several thousand dollars for this last enterprise, before the new members of the troupe had arrived; they have lately again subscribed to the amount of about $300 per night. This is certainly as much as can be reasonably expected from a class of our citizens who prefer living within their means, to the very empty reputation of ruining themselves for a manager, or rather his company.

It took time before Italian opera paid in this city, (some people say that it does not pay even now.) The friends of German opera ought, therefore, not to despair. As well as the Philharmonic Concerts could be made fashionable, (the only means of covering the expenses for any enterprise of this kind,) as well may we expect that German opera will at last succeed. But then, of course, the manager ought to do his whole duty; that is to say, he ought to give us a complete and good company, and a repertoire of such operas which can really serve to cultivate the taste for German opera.”